Advertising Amazon Amazon Advertising Amazon Experts Amazon Listing Optimization Amazon Marketplace Amazon News Amazon Prime Amazon Professional Sellers Summit Amazon Seller amazon sellers Amazon Seller Tips Amazon Seller Tools ASIN Brand Management Brands Buy Box Campaign Manager Conference COVID-19 downloadable Dynamic Pricing Ecommerce FBA FBM Holiday Season industry news Multi-Channel Fulfillment Optimize pay-per-click Pricing Algorithm Pricing Software Private Label Profits Repricing Repricing Software Revenue Sales Seller Seller-Fulfilled Prime Seller Performance Metrics SEO SKU Sponsored Products Ads Strategy
Get the latest insights right in your inbox
Published: November 04, 2019
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Marissa Incitti leads research and content at Feedvisor focused on Amazon, Walmart, and the broader e-commerce marketplace ecosystem. Her work covers retail media performance, pricing strategy, and how AI-driven discovery is reshaping how brands compete across marketplaces. Prior to Feedvisor, she worked in content leadership roles at a Fortune Global 500 omnichannel commerce technology company.
1P (First Party): You sell wholesale to Amazon as a Vendor. Amazon owns the inventory and sets the retail price.
3P (Third Party): You sell directly to customers on Amazon’s marketplace as a Seller. You own the listing, pricing, and inventory.
Most brands chase a Vendor Central invite for the “sold by Amazon” badge - then discover they’ve handed over pricing control, cash flow, and margin for a trust signal that matters less than they think. Meanwhile, Amazon has been quietly terminating 1P accounts for vendors under $5-10M in annual sales, pushing the marketplace toward a 3P-first model.
The real question isn’t which model sounds better. It’s how much margin and control you’re willing to trade for operational simplicity - and whether you even have the choice anymore.
| Aspect | 1P (Vendor Central) | 3P (Seller Central) |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship | Wholesale supplier to Amazon | Retailer selling to consumers |
| Access | Invite-only | Open to anyone |
| Pricing control | Amazon sets retail prices | You set prices |
| Fulfillment | Amazon handles everything | FBA, FBM, or SFP |
| Margins | Wholesale (lower) | Retail (typically higher) |
| Payment terms | 60-90 days | 14-day cycle |
| Brand control | Limited | Full control |
| Product pages | Amazon’s merchandising team | You manage directly |
| Fees | Flat participation + co-op fees (10-15% of invoice) | Referral + fulfillment fees |
That fee structure line deserves a closer look, because it’s where most of the margin difference lives.
Consider a product that retails at $30. On 1P, Amazon typically buys wholesale at roughly 50% off retail - so you receive $15 per unit. Your gross margin before COGS is $15.
On 3P with FBA, you keep the retail price minus a 15% referral fee ($4.50) and an estimated $5.50 FBA fulfillment fee. That leaves you $20 per unit before COGS - a $5 per-unit advantage over 1P, or roughly 33% more gross margin.
But here’s where cash flow compounds the gap. A 1P vendor doing $100K in monthly revenue waits 60-90 days for payment. That’s $200-300K tied up in receivables at any given time. A 3P seller at the same volume collects every 14 days, keeping working capital under $50K.
The margin advantage is real. But it shrinks fast in categories with sub-$15 average selling prices, where FBA fees can eat 30-40% of the retail price. Run the numbers on your actual catalog before making this the deciding factor.
A 1P relationship means Amazon buys your inventory wholesale and resells it. You ship against purchase orders, and once products reach Amazon’s warehouses, they’re Amazon’s to price however it wants.
That last part is the sticking point. Amazon’s pricing algorithms will undercut competitors - including your own pricing on other channels - which can break MAP agreements and destabilize your brand’s price structure across retail. Every ASIN sold via 1P carries the “Ships from and sold by Amazon.com” badge, and all product detail page changes go through Amazon’s merchandising team on Vendor Central.
Where 1P works well: Bulk purchase orders on a predictable cadence, Amazon-managed product pages, consumer trust from the “sold by Amazon” badge, and a genuinely hands-off operation. You don’t touch pick-and-pack, listing optimization, or customer service.
Where it breaks down: You’re waiting 60-90 days for payment, absorbing chargebacks when POs ship late or stock runs short, and watching Amazon price your products below what you’d choose. The “hands-off” benefit also means you can’t run a flash promotion or adjust pricing to clear seasonal inventory without Amazon’s cooperation.
With 3P, you’re the retailer. Seller Central is your dashboard for listings, orders, inventory, and advertising. The operational load is heavier, but every lever that drives profitability is in your hands.
Pricing is the biggest one. You set and adjust retail prices in real time - responding to competitor moves, running promotions, protecting margins on slow movers. That control extends to your entire brand presence: catalog structure, product content, Brand Registry protections, and the ability to launch new products and accelerate sales velocity without waiting for Amazon to approve copy changes.
Fulfillment is your choice. FBA gives you the Prime badge and Amazon’s logistics infrastructure. FBM keeps fulfillment in-house. SFP offers a middle path. Each has different cost structures, and the right answer depends on your unit economics - not on which sounds simplest.
The trade-off is bandwidth. You’re responsible for listing optimization, advertising campaigns, customer service (if FBM), and managing marketplace fees - referral fees, fulfillment fees, and storage costs. A 3P operation at scale isn’t “hands-off” by any measure. Budget at least 0.5-1 FTE per 200 active SKUs to run it properly.
3P brands also lack the implicit trust of the “sold by Amazon” badge. That means seller feedback, product reviews, and account health metrics carry more weight for Buy Box positioning and customer confidence.
Framing this as 1P vs. 3P misses what most established brands are actually doing. Nearly half of 1P vendors now also run 3P accounts - not as a fallback, but as a deliberate strategy.
The logic is straightforward. Keep high-volume, core SKUs on 1P where Amazon’s fulfillment velocity and the “sold by Amazon” badge add value. Run new launches, bundles, seasonal items, and higher-margin products through 3P where you control price and margin. When Amazon’s PO system creates stock gaps - and it will, roughly 20% of the time - your 3P listings keep revenue flowing.
Hybrid also gives you negotiating leverage. If Amazon’s vendor team pushes for deeper wholesale discounts, your 3P presence means you aren’t completely dependent on their purchase orders.
That said, hybrid fails if you don’t have separate operational capacity for each channel. Running both from the same three-person ops team usually creates more stockouts and listing conflicts than it prevents. You need distinct inventory planning, separate advertising strategies, and clear rules for which ASINs live where. Without that discipline, hybrid becomes a mess rather than an advantage.
Stop Guessing Between 1P and 3P
See how it works →In late 2024, Amazon began terminating Vendor Central accounts for brands generating under $5-10M annually. This wasn’t a subtle policy shift - it was a deliberate push toward a marketplace-first model.
The brands that remain on Vendor Central share a profile: enterprise-scale revenue ($20M+ annually), categories where Amazon’s supply chain has deep investment (grocery, CPG, essentials), and the ability to meet increasingly strict cost and compliance demands. Everyone else is being moved out, willingly or not.
If you’re a 1P vendor below the $10M threshold, build your 3P presence now - on your terms. Brands that wait for the termination notice scramble to set up Seller Central accounts, create listings from scratch, and build seller metrics with zero history. Brands that transition proactively bring over optimized listings, established FBA inventory, and a working advertising strategy.
For brands still pursuing a Vendor Central invite, Amazon evaluates manufacturer or distributor status, strong sales history (often demonstrated first via Seller Central), operational capacity for wholesale-scale fulfillment, product demand, and brand trademark ownership. The paths in are organic invitation from strong 3P performance, direct outreach from Amazon’s retail team, or proactively contacting Amazon’s vendor recruitment division. But given the contraction trend, ask whether the invite is worth pursuing at all.
Skip the generic “it depends on your goals” framework. Here’s where the math points:
Default to 3P unless you have a specific, quantifiable reason not to. The margin advantage, payment terms, and pricing control make 3P the better option for most brands. The operational overhead is real, but it’s the cost of controlling your own business on Amazon.
1P makes sense in a narrow band: You’re doing $10M+ in Amazon sales, you genuinely prefer the hands-off model, you can absorb 60-90 day payment terms without cash flow strain, and you’re comfortable with Amazon controlling your retail pricing and potentially undercutting your other channels.
Hybrid is the play for established brands with both high-volume core products and a diverse catalog. But only if you can resource it properly - separate teams, separate inventory planning, clear ASIN allocation rules.
One thing worth watching: industry signals point toward a potential merger of Vendor Central and Seller Central into a unified “Supplier Central” platform. Amazon hasn’t confirmed this, but the direction is consistent with the contraction trend. As of early 2026, remaining 1P vendors face mandatory ASN v2 labeling, automated compliance audits, and higher chargeback penalties. The compliance burden is rising while the program shrinks.
Yes, and many mid-tier brands are doing exactly this. The transition requires a Seller Central account, new listings, FBA inventory setup, and time to build seller metrics - plan for 2-3 months before you’re running at full capacity.
Nearly half of 1P vendors do. Route high-volume SKUs through 1P and use 3P for launches, bundles, and higher-margin products. The key constraint isn’t Amazon’s rules - it’s whether you have the operational bandwidth to manage both channels without creating inventory conflicts.
1P: 60-90 days. 3P: every 14 days.
Products “sold by Amazon” carry a structural Buy Box advantage - but it’s not absolute. A 3P seller with competitive pricing, strong account health metrics, and FBA fulfillment wins the Buy Box consistently in most categories. The gap narrows further when you factor in that 3P sellers can reprice dynamically while 1P pricing is Amazon’s call. If you’re optimizing for Buy Box ownership specifically, the pricing control you get with 3P often matters more than the 1P badge.
An unconfirmed future platform that would merge Vendor Central and Seller Central. Amazon hasn’t officially announced it, but the Vendor Central contraction and operational consolidation trends suggest the platforms are converging.
Your 1P Margins Are Worse Than You Think